Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

safe distance to live from cell phone tower  found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.